Chicago has one of the strictest gun laws in the nation and still people are being murdered everyday and what does the Chicago police chief do point fingers at everyone else about the problem. How about taken these so called highly trained SWAT TEAMS and go in and get these illegal gun's off the streets or better then that how about enforcing the laws already on the books. I am so tired of hearing these police chief's always waining and pointing fingers at everyone else when they fail to do their jobs.
Always the first words out of their mouths are BAN,BAN, And BAN, If he is unable to control his city maybe it's time to get a new police chief. Someone who doesn't whimper when he can't handle the job. All they do is complain about the problems without doing anything to stop it. Quit blaming others for your inability to do your job. These guns these gangs have are not purchased legally so go get them off the streets and stop pretending that banning guns will do your jobs. Its amazing how you will send a twenty men highly trained swat team to take the gun of a legal gun owner but won't send them after the illegal gun owners. Maybe it's time to look at these chiefs and see if they are qualiflyed to hold their jobs.
Sunday, September 22, 2013
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
GUN CONTROL- WHEN WILL THE TRUTH COME OUT FROM WASHINGTON?
Gun control and here we go again blaming all legal gun owners for the government in ability not to enforce the gun laws already on the books. All this points right back at the government and law enforcement. The warnings were there but no one seemed to want to act apond them.
When this Young Man with a anger problem had had two shooting incidents no one reacted to find out what was his problem and see if this young man should even have owned guns. This young man went onto he naval shipyard in Washington DC and killed 12 people (why)? Why did he have a security contractor ID? Why wasn't these background checks showing up these past problems with this young man. Look at Washington DC which have one of the toughness gun laws in America and the naval shipyard that has security all over he place failed to prevent this tragedy.
Now all the liberals in Washington headed up by Feinstien ,Shuma,Obama and the rest of their group will want more laws to be put in place with the ones they can't seem to enforce now. The system failed and they will not take the responsibility for that. All they can do is point fingers and blame everyone else. The law enforcement failed to use the current laws on the books and the government failed to properly do a background check by leaving it up to a contractor to do their own background check. The gun owners of America know that Fienstein doesn't want more gun laws she wants our guns. She and her elite friends don't worry about being attack or have a home invasion because they all have armed bodyguard's and live in gated communities. You hear that all the elite,movie stars,singers politicians and anyone with any kind if standing in this country have armed bodyguards.
When the government starts to enforce the laws already on the books then a difference will happen.
But now Feinstein will be running up and downs the halls of congress blaming everyone else who didn't vote her way for what happened in the naval shipyard in DC. This young man had a mental problem and that's what we need to focus on and try to prevent this from happening again
When this Young Man with a anger problem had had two shooting incidents no one reacted to find out what was his problem and see if this young man should even have owned guns. This young man went onto he naval shipyard in Washington DC and killed 12 people (why)? Why did he have a security contractor ID? Why wasn't these background checks showing up these past problems with this young man. Look at Washington DC which have one of the toughness gun laws in America and the naval shipyard that has security all over he place failed to prevent this tragedy.
Now all the liberals in Washington headed up by Feinstien ,Shuma,Obama and the rest of their group will want more laws to be put in place with the ones they can't seem to enforce now. The system failed and they will not take the responsibility for that. All they can do is point fingers and blame everyone else. The law enforcement failed to use the current laws on the books and the government failed to properly do a background check by leaving it up to a contractor to do their own background check. The gun owners of America know that Fienstein doesn't want more gun laws she wants our guns. She and her elite friends don't worry about being attack or have a home invasion because they all have armed bodyguard's and live in gated communities. You hear that all the elite,movie stars,singers politicians and anyone with any kind if standing in this country have armed bodyguards.
When the government starts to enforce the laws already on the books then a difference will happen.
But now Feinstein will be running up and downs the halls of congress blaming everyone else who didn't vote her way for what happened in the naval shipyard in DC. This young man had a mental problem and that's what we need to focus on and try to prevent this from happening again
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
WHY ARE SO MANY AMERICANS AGAINST SYRIA INTERVENTION.
I can only speak for myself on this subject. I am against intervention in Syria because I can't get a clear picture of who's telling the truth on either side.
With so much happening everyday it hard to see the truth. The question is did Assad use chemical weapons or was it a false flag to which we have seen before in other conflicts. Freedom fighters,the question is who are the real freedom fighters with so many different groups involved in the fighting and committing so many deaths of christens, burning of churches and the killing or executions of capture Assad troops all of which is against the Geneva convention.
It has developed into a quagmire of who is who in the freedom fighters. I really don't think a limit strike on Assad would help the situation in Syria but increase the lightly hood of more spreading of the conflict.
A slip of the tongue by secretary Kerry made make the most since and I hope the Russians will follow thru with it. Someone has to start using some COMMON SENSE and bring this problem back into control instead of allowing this situation to spread out of control. Its time to take a step back and take a breath and continue looking at a political agreement to end this attack and conflict. This is a civil war amound the Syrian people and all foreign fighters should get out and let the Syrian people settle this war.This is a UN political problem and a world problem and not just an American problem.
In a time of crisis only cool heads will prevail. Now the cool heads are in Russian's hands so lets see if they are able to handle the ball. Good Luck. S.A.D.
With so much happening everyday it hard to see the truth. The question is did Assad use chemical weapons or was it a false flag to which we have seen before in other conflicts. Freedom fighters,the question is who are the real freedom fighters with so many different groups involved in the fighting and committing so many deaths of christens, burning of churches and the killing or executions of capture Assad troops all of which is against the Geneva convention.
It has developed into a quagmire of who is who in the freedom fighters. I really don't think a limit strike on Assad would help the situation in Syria but increase the lightly hood of more spreading of the conflict.
A slip of the tongue by secretary Kerry made make the most since and I hope the Russians will follow thru with it. Someone has to start using some COMMON SENSE and bring this problem back into control instead of allowing this situation to spread out of control. Its time to take a step back and take a breath and continue looking at a political agreement to end this attack and conflict. This is a civil war amound the Syrian people and all foreign fighters should get out and let the Syrian people settle this war.This is a UN political problem and a world problem and not just an American problem.
In a time of crisis only cool heads will prevail. Now the cool heads are in Russian's hands so lets see if they are able to handle the ball. Good Luck. S.A.D.
Thursday, September 5, 2013
AMERICA! SHOULD WE OR SHOULDN'T WE GET INVOLVED IN SYRIA ?
I sit here at home and wonder about the so call RED LINE on chemical weapons that so many countries signed agreement treaty banning them from ever being used. We see women and children being killed by them which is a horrible site to see.
My problem is why now do we want to attack Assad for using them even when they say he cross the RED LINE. When Hussin use them to kill thousands in Iraq we stood by. By saying we stood by that means also the international countries did the same. When Iraq went to war with Iran and ten's of thousands Iranians were killed in chemical attacks where was America and the international countries then to condem the use of them.
Are we to pick and choose when and by who these weapons can be use against being an enemy or thier own cilvillians. Are we to set back and allow a country to use them if the country being attack is a country we don't like. If we are to stop such use of these weapons all countries must be involved in saying NO and to back it up with whatever action the international union see's fit to use to stop it period. We can't pick and choose when to enforce the RED LINE. Any country that stand in the way of stopping the use of chemical weapons are as guilty as the person or country's that used them. S.A.D.
My problem is why now do we want to attack Assad for using them even when they say he cross the RED LINE. When Hussin use them to kill thousands in Iraq we stood by. By saying we stood by that means also the international countries did the same. When Iraq went to war with Iran and ten's of thousands Iranians were killed in chemical attacks where was America and the international countries then to condem the use of them.
Are we to pick and choose when and by who these weapons can be use against being an enemy or thier own cilvillians. Are we to set back and allow a country to use them if the country being attack is a country we don't like. If we are to stop such use of these weapons all countries must be involved in saying NO and to back it up with whatever action the international union see's fit to use to stop it period. We can't pick and choose when to enforce the RED LINE. Any country that stand in the way of stopping the use of chemical weapons are as guilty as the person or country's that used them. S.A.D.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)